Skip to main content
14 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jan 20, 2021 at 17:35 answer added Mr_Green timeline score: -3
Dec 22, 2017 at 7:46 answer added Journeyman Geek timeline score: 6
Dec 21, 2017 at 17:01 comment added Say No To Censorship @SK I made some edits so it looks like an objective question not attacking any particular user. Your original question was good as well but for some reason the majority of users didn't think so. Let's see if they like this version better :)
Dec 21, 2017 at 16:37 history edited Say No To Censorship CC BY-SA 3.0
add few more examples, clarify intent...
Dec 21, 2017 at 16:31 history edited Say No To Censorship CC BY-SA 3.0
add few more examples, clarify intent...
S Dec 19, 2017 at 15:37 history mod moved comments to chat
S Dec 19, 2017 at 15:37 comment added Keshav Srinivasan Mod Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
Dec 19, 2017 at 13:08 comment added S K et tu @rickross? it is NOT NOT NOT left to the widow to decide. It is ILLEGAL - which part of "illegal" don't you understand? When you say the scriptures praise it, don't you understand it is an endorsement of it to fellow Hindus?
Dec 19, 2017 at 8:56 comment added Keshav Srinivasan Mod No, we don't require users to state their thoughts on anything. And this is irrelevant for Meta, but one can believe that Sati is morally permissible without thinking that everyone must do it.
Dec 19, 2017 at 5:40 comment added Rickross Discussing a custom like Sati is pretty much irrelevant at present as the custom itself is obsolete now. But as far as scriptures are concerned, they highly praise the practice, but they also say that it is not mandatory. It can not be forced upon one who is not willing. It is left to the widows to decide.
Dec 19, 2017 at 3:23 review Close votes
Dec 25, 2017 at 3:13
Dec 19, 2017 at 2:12 answer added S K timeline score: -8
Dec 18, 2017 at 19:26 history edited S K CC BY-SA 3.0
spelling
Dec 18, 2017 at 19:16 history asked S K CC BY-SA 3.0