In ever increasing list of wrongly deleted answers described here, there is 1 more leaf got added:
In this answer, I had posted images of Khajuraho. As requested in question, obviously there cannot be "scriptures" on pornography as it's a modern term. So I found it appropriate to cite "sculptures"! Whether it's good/bad, is subjective & matter of up/down vote.
However the answer is deleted (I foresaw it happening), saying that some users found these images offensive.
"People have complained about these images being offensive, so I'm deleting your answer"
We all know that mod will not decide only based on what users feel, they will also consider own conscience. So effectively "the moderator" also found it offensive.
In comments, I clarified that the Khajuraho sculptures belong to the temple, which is recognized by Indian government. It's neither offensive nor illegal to talk, view or cite them.
I would like to know under what category of guidelines of this site, these images are "offensive"?
I also request other moderators to come forward & provide their view on this topic. Because, I find them to be less enthusiastic on deletion. :-)
For those who consider Khajuraho as "dirty", may refer to this (41:00) video from a movie. The actor in that clip is late Vijay Anand, former head of censor board. Incidentally he wanted to liberalize the Indian film industry.