I am currently confused between these alternatives:

  • the sum total of all traditions followed in modern day India?
  • the value system of Canakya Pandita, the principal creator of the modern-day India?
  • the value system of Mahatma Gandhi?
  • the value system of emperor Ashoka, whose emblem India still carries?
  • the impressions of people on the other side of the Sindhu river (about people on this side)?
  • the impressions of some invaders who could not distinguish the different traditions?
  • the common practices of saints of various traditions?

As you see, these are all caustic proposals, but please give a heartfelt honest-ones in answer, because somebody must have thought that "Hinduism" is a good title. My view is that it is a misnomer only used by people ignorant to the roots of the aryan culture or sanatana-dharma. I have studied vedic philosophy for over 20 years and even follow many of it's practical aspects, but calling me a "hinduist" would be an offense, because I don't see Hinduism as a coherent identity, unless we qualify it as Vedic, everything based on the Vedas, including the fifth Veda (puranas and itihasas). I would call "hinduist" a person who is coerced into following some India-related traditions without properly understanding them. Or, the speaker lacks understanding. Because, if he understood, then there would be a better, more scientific designation, both by eastern and western standards.

Also, Buddhism and Christianity have their own sites, so it would be appropriate to specialize on this site just on the Vedic culture. That would also solve the quality problem with answers, because it would be clear what to quote from and where to check references. By Vedic standards, an answer without a quote from the shastra is totally non-expert, actually a disturbance to society (sruti smrti puranadi pancaratra vidhim vina aikantiki harer bhaktir utpatayaiva kalpate). OK, there are 6 philosophical systems derived from Vedas, but each of them has a foundational treatise and commentaries that can be quoted and verified, and they all illuminate some part of the same Vedic body of knowledge.

An what about the title? "Hinduism" is appealing to dummies, but it might scare off experts. There is no such thing as Hinduism, the very term is ill-defined. Sanatana-dharma has been proposed, but I think "Vedic culture" is better understandable for both insiders and outsiders.

closed as too broad by Mr. Alien, user3459110, NullPoiиteя, hims056, Mr_Green Jun 26 '14 at 8:51

Please edit the question to limit it to a specific problem with enough detail to identify an adequate answer. Avoid asking multiple distinct questions at once. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • Here is the problem with making this a Vedic site: the vast majority of practicing Hindus today do not live their religious lives exclusively according to the Vedas. This would greatly reduce the usefulness of the site to others. I do not know what the solution to this problem is, but I do know that restricting to only Vedic practice is not the solution. – senshin Jun 20 '14 at 6:35
  • I feel this is too broad – Mr. Alien Jun 20 '14 at 8:17
  • hmm... makes sense to me – user115 Jun 20 '14 at 14:50
  • I completely agree with you -- nice Bhakti Rasamrita quote. Seems like the best we can do is to promote the Vedic cultural perspective as much as we can on here by properly quoting scripture and vote down answers that are speculation. – cheenbabes Jun 20 '14 at 16:07

In Short
Hinduism is a major religious and cultural tradition of South Asia, which developed from Vedic religion.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .