I'm talking about the question: Is Rama Setu a historical proof of Ramayana?
It is quite obvious that the question isn't suitable for our site and that's why it is closed as well. It can't be answered using sources which are allowed on this site. And, hence you can see an attempted answer uses sources (like newspaper articles) which aren't accepted here.
But I believe it may have better responses if moved to an appropriate site where experts in the field of history, archaeology are present.
So, I request the Mods to do the needful and migrate the question to an appropriate site like History.SE. If you know about another site where it's more suitable (than History) then suggest that too.