I posted the question Why don't we start a sect-wise SEs in Hinduism? on March 10, 2020, with a view to eliciting opinions of members of this site.
As of today, at the time of posting this question, the earlier question has received 14 downvotes and 5 upvotes. Good thing that atleast 5 members out of the 19 members, preferred this idea. The remaining members remained silent.
After posting the above question, many of my questions/answers in the main site were either downvoted, or attempted to close down.
I posted the question Why did (Late) Sri K. M. Ganguli consider Anushasana Parva to be an interpolation? in the main site, as I had some doubts on this topic.
@SrimannarayanaKV, of course there is groupism. every sect will try to enforce their values. what i'm saying is that you are using the groupism-blame to cover up your lack of providing evidence and your unacceptance of provided evidence. – ram 22 hours ago
I know how groupism works in this site. It is very common for a group of members to harass and hound members like user965167. It is also common for downvoting the unpleasant answers like this one posted by members like me and passing sarcastic remarks. @ram – Srimannarayana K V 20 hours ago
When the group of members, who follow Sri Ramanuja, could not provide evidence for claiming Narayana and Lakshmi as SUPREME God heads, from Rig Veda, Why are you asking me for showing evidence? Further, what type of evidence are you expecting from me? Can you explain? @ram – Srimannarayana K V 20 hours ago
@SrimannarayanaKV, I don't know what discussion you had earlier and who provided what evidence from where. But I have a simpler question - Why restrict your choice of evidence to ONLY Rig Veda ? Can you show proof that YOU exist from Rig Veda ? – ram 9 hours ago
@SrimannarayanaKV, i don't see any sarcastic remarks in the ashvamedha answer you posted. I also don't see any evidence for your claim that it is an interpolation other than your assumption that ashvamedha yagna can only be for 1 purpose. putra kameshti is specifically for getting sons. ashvamedha is generally for lordship over earth. no yagna bears fruit if the doer is very sinful. so part of yagna is also prayaschitta to get rid of sins. You go from an assumption (ashvamedha yagna has 2 results mentioned) to claim (so uttara kanda is fake). It rightly deserves downvotes, although I did not. – ram 8 hours ago
You failed to see the sarcasm because you are also with the Idea that the Uttarakanda is not interpolation. It is because the content in Uttarakanda suits to your Idea that Sri Rama is an incarnation of Vishnu, which is not. Anyways, be happy alongwith other members in your illusions and sarcasm. However, as yourself had admitted the groupism is existing in this site, and your silence regarding harassment and hounding of members like user965167 by your group members will itself indicates the very fact that how valid my post in META about division of HSE into sect wise SEs. @ram – Srimannarayana K V 5 hours ago
Finally, the member ram stated as follows:
@SrimannarayanaKV, wait a minute - so you actually think that Sri Rama is not an avatara of Vishnu ?? No wonder you feel there is groupism on this site. I realize I have wasted my time talking to a troll. – ram 2 hours ago
When a member of a particular sect himself admitted that there is groupism in this site, and calls other member as troll and the lone biased moderator looks on silently, what more can be expected from this site?
Today, the attitude of the above member ram and his group of members, belonging to one particular sect and behaving in autocratic manner, proved once again that this site is soon going to die.
Perhaps, the lone moderator of this site belongs to that particular sect.
Is it not a right time to divide the HSE sect wise?