Can users who constantly engage in edit-wars with other users over tags be banned from the site?

Question

Does the system allow for banning users who engage in disruptive behavior of the following nature;

1. User doesn't like the use of a particular tag. Instead of bringing the issue to notice on meta, user tries to fix the issue themselves i.e., take matters into their own hands. User doesn't believe in community voting, arriving at a consensus, etc.

2. User doesn't like certain type of questions they read on the site. They find the content objectionable even if the questions don't break the Code of Conduct. Instead of flagging or coming to meta to discuss the problem with these types of questions, user now asks mock questions on the main site to show the problem with the other questions they don't like. Other users who also don't like the original questions now upvote these mock questions.

What can be done with such users?

Can they be temporarily banned from the site to prevent them from doing this over & over?

With regard to mock questions, can the 'rude or abusive' flag be used since technically it's an abuse of the SE system? Are mods of this site going to honor the flag?

This MSE post says:

What makes something rude or abusive and when should I flag it?

A post should be marked as rude or abusive (formerly known as offensive) if it contains hate speech, obscenities, abuse against people, or abuse of the community or system, i.e., a clear violation of the be-nice policy.

Answer 1

There is a provision for banning a user form suggesting an edit if s/he doesn't have edit privileges.

Well, usually edit/roll-back wars are handled by locking posts which are under dispute and by guiding users engaged in edit wars not to (do that) but if a user having edit-privileges observed continuously engaged in edit/roll-back war on multiple posts even after suggested not to (do so) by moderators then Yes, moderators can suspend him/her depending on how much harm or destruction is done by a user to the community.

User doesn't like the use of a particular tag...
User doesn't like certain type of questions...

This site doesn't entertain liking and disliking of users, that's the thing users need to understand and learn. If a user having some suggestions, s/he should post it on meta. If you find rude/offensive behavior that hurts then you can flag.

Answer 2

The title and the body asks different questions.

For the title:

Yes, they can be banned.

For the first point:

If a user thinks the added tag is wrong, they can rollback the edit as said in the help center.

Users with more than 1,000 reputation are considered trusted community members and can edit posts without going through the review process.

So, taking into their hands and editing the question to correct tags or content is fine up to some extent.

BUT, here's the key. If a user constantly edits which he likes without following proper tagging guidelines and editing guidelines, that revision should be kept which is followed through community consensus and help center. Tagging is not personal choice. We have to tag it based on question's topic. E.g If I personally have problem with ramayana or mahabharata due to my faith, I can't just remove the tag from questions after earning a reputation of 1000 or 5000.

For a user with edit privileges, there's no edit ban. There is a suspension altogether. If a user with privileges constantly indulges in a series of bad edits and superfluous edits, the user will be contacted by moderators. The revisions will be restored to previous versions. If the behaviour continues, the user can be suspended for a period.(See Is there an equivalent for suggested edit ban for 2k+ users? from Meta Stack Exchange) So, it is moderators' call when to take actions on user with above mentioned qualities.

Second point:

If the questions are posted just to mock the system, they will be faced a question ban and eventually a suspension too. Questions and answers which are for trolling are not allowed on the site as far as I know. For this, we can use a moderator intervention flag. I wouldn't suggest you to use Rude flags. Rude flags can be used if a user is constantly abusing the system by writing gibberish like "asjydnkfeiy". Even though it's not actually harassment, we can use red flags because it's abusing system. This also depends on moderators when to act on flags and what action to take.

Answer 3

I am highlighting the exceptional case if the case happened due to an exceptional tag.

If only a single user doesn't like a particular tag owing to his dislike towards to tag, the user needs to understand the perspective of community & site. If he doesn't understand, like other answer has said, there are provisions to deal with the situation.

But if consensus or community or majority of users themselves show opposition towards a particular tag then @Moderators need to arrive at valid & consistent conclusion regarding the particular controversial tag, not towards a user who is engaging in such edit war. Such edit war due to a controversial tag is rooted in indecisiveness of the use of tag only, nothing otherwise.

I opine the use of the controversial tag should come to halt until @Moderators arrive at final decisive conclusion regarding the tag which majority of users or community don't like. Because if frequent tagging a controversial tag doesn't make for an edit war then how frequent untagging of the same tag can make for an edit war?

P.S: Current controversial tag is mythology