There are many texts that I am researching on which are just going on in the name of scriptures, but really if we dig deep, we don't really find any information. And these scriptures make big claims.
For eg:Shiva Gita without any source, Ashtavakra Gita, this seems to be an independent text.., Brahma Samhita - atleast they acknowledge it is recently discovered..
Below are some things that others also quoted but not available now.
Madhva quoted from books that are not available now like Maha Samhita, Chatur veda sikha etc..
Shri Vaishnavas quoted books that are not extant today.. I will update this as I find out the names. Their conception of sayujya being highest liberation seems to be based on a verse seen here, though it is not present today and bhagavat seems to reject all types of liberation.
These are quoted in some of their commentaries. Should we allow that portions to be cited.
I am researching on all the gitas and will update the list when I find credible information.
Should we allow these texts to be called or cited as scripture?