First, what pramāṇa are acceptable? Second, if the claims of two proofs are inconsistent, which method should win out?
I know there are related questions in this Meta, but they are limited to one or a couple pramāṇa. I would like one definitive place which lists all acceptable proofs with their order of acceptability to reference in future.
Edit: My question isn't in reference to valid texts.
For Charvaka only Pratyakṣa was epistemologically valid; for Vaiśeṣika, Pratyakṣa & Anumāna; for Sankhya, Yoga, and earlier Vedānta schools Pratyakṣa, Anumāna, and Śabda are valid sources of knowledge; for Nyāya, Pratyakṣa, Anumāna, Śabda, and Upamāna; the Mīmāṃsā school added Arthapatti to the previous four; and for Advaita Vedānta Anupalabdi was added.
So, my question is which types of evidence does this SE consider epistemelogically valid and which take precedence over which?