4

In particular I am concerned about a site that spouts virulent hatred not only against Shiva but also against revered figures like Chandrasekara saraswati - the sankaracharya of Kanchi before the present one. Although a Smarta, he had enormous following among vaishnavites. To denigrate him is just gutter-level hate. That site is full of erroneous facts and erroneous arguments and it is just ENDLESS hate.

Is there a policy not to allow citations of websites with hate content?

10
  • 1
    Blogs are not considered reliable source.
    – Pandya Mod
    Commented Feb 27, 2018 at 0:24
  • but they are allowed in comments
    – S K
    Commented Feb 27, 2018 at 0:28
  • 1
    Why r u too much bothered about comments with links to that site? as told such websites are not allowed to cite in answers..@SK
    – Rickross
    Commented Feb 27, 2018 at 3:38
  • @Pandya Correctoin. Blogs which are just blog owner's interpretation are not allowed. Else, they are allowed. Commented Feb 27, 2018 at 4:25
  • 1
    Possible duplicate of Which scriptures / sources are considered valid? Commented Feb 27, 2018 at 4:27
  • 1
    We do no discuss about external websites on meta. We only discuss about Hinduism.SE that is main site. Remove the name of the website in the question. All websites are equally valid as sources if they are citing scriptural sources and not just random opinion of the author of the blog. Commented Feb 27, 2018 at 4:28
  • Note: One who wants to know the name of the site can see in edits. Commented Feb 27, 2018 at 9:52
  • citing that site allows posters to "outsource" their hate in comments. All posters here with the same ideology as that site know about it, and have cited it, including the most prolific poster here.
    – S K
    Commented Feb 27, 2018 at 11:49
  • You can always flag hate speech comment as rude/offensive.
    – Pandya Mod
    Commented Feb 27, 2018 at 12:36
  • can i flag urls pointing to hate websites @pandya ? "Blogs which are just blog owner's interpretation are not allowed. Else, they are allowed" says Sarvabhouma. this hate site misquotes scripture, cherry picks scripture and spews venom about Chandrasekara Saraswati - a revered figure. It looks like sarvabhauma thinks that is peachy keen.
    – S K
    Commented Feb 27, 2018 at 13:03

0

You must log in to answer this question.

Browse other questions tagged .