Skip to main content
Hinduism Meta

Return to Question

Clarification and corrections
Source Link
iammilind
iammilind
  • 19.9k
  • 1
  • 16
  • 22

What is the code of conduct during the edit warsdisputes among users?

Below is just for an example purpose:

The question is edited again and again for tagging despite OP's consent. https://hinduism.stackexchange.com/posts/28670/revisions

Similarly my answer is edited again and again despite warning the user: https://hinduism.stackexchange.com/posts/28679/revisions

The editors cite that what they think is correct and they are following community guidelines.

Question: What is the basic code of conduct when there is aan edit dispute between 2 users?
Which user should stop editing to avoid edit war?

Note: I amThis post is not askingabout whether the above edits are correct or not. That will generate opinions. This is also not specific to the post. The question is about how the editors should conduct when there is a clear mismatch of opinionopinions.

This question is not to belittle anyone. However our site is a heterogeneous collection of all kind of users. Some of them are professionals, some are retired, some are into spirituality and some are merely college going students. So we cannot expect same maturity levels from all. Hence better to decide a code of conduct.

Until the mod responds to the flag they shouldn't be rolling back to their versions until their mouses blast. :-)

What is the code of conduct during the edit wars?

Below is just for an example purpose:

The question is edited again and again for tagging despite OP's consent. https://hinduism.stackexchange.com/posts/28670/revisions

Similarly my answer is edited again and again despite warning the user: https://hinduism.stackexchange.com/posts/28679/revisions

The editors cite that what they think is correct and they are following community guidelines.

Question: What is the basic code of conduct when there is a dispute between 2 users?

Note: I am not asking whether the edits are correct or not. That will generate opinions. The question is about how the editors should conduct when there is a clear mismatch of opinion.

This question is not to belittle anyone. However our site is a heterogeneous collection of all kind of users. Some of them are professionals, some are retired, some are into spirituality and some are merely college going students. So we cannot expect same maturity levels from all. Hence better to decide a code of conduct.

Until the mod responds to the flag they shouldn't be rolling back to their versions until their mouses blast. :-)

What is the code of conduct during the edit disputes among users?

Below is just for an example purpose:

The question is edited again and again for tagging despite OP's consent. https://hinduism.stackexchange.com/posts/28670/revisions

Similarly my answer is edited again and again despite warning the user: https://hinduism.stackexchange.com/posts/28679/revisions

The editors cite that what they think is correct and they are following community guidelines.

Question: What is the basic code of conduct when there is an edit dispute between 2 users?
Which user should stop editing to avoid edit war?

Note: This post is not about whether the above edits are correct or not. That will generate opinions. This is also not specific to the post. The question is about how the editors should conduct when there is a clear mismatch of opinions.

This question is not to belittle anyone. However our site is a heterogeneous collection of all kind of users. Some of them are professionals, some are retired, some are into spirituality and some are merely college going students. So we cannot expect same maturity levels from all. Hence better to decide a code of conduct.

Until the mod responds to the flag they shouldn't be rolling back to their versions until their mouses blast. :-)

Source Link
iammilind
iammilind
  • 19.9k
  • 1
  • 16
  • 22

What is the code of conduct during the edit wars?

Below is just for an example purpose:

The question is edited again and again for tagging despite OP's consent. https://hinduism.stackexchange.com/posts/28670/revisions

Similarly my answer is edited again and again despite warning the user: https://hinduism.stackexchange.com/posts/28679/revisions

The editors cite that what they think is correct and they are following community guidelines.

Question: What is the basic code of conduct when there is a dispute between 2 users?

Note: I am not asking whether the edits are correct or not. That will generate opinions. The question is about how the editors should conduct when there is a clear mismatch of opinion.

This question is not to belittle anyone. However our site is a heterogeneous collection of all kind of users. Some of them are professionals, some are retired, some are into spirituality and some are merely college going students. So we cannot expect same maturity levels from all. Hence better to decide a code of conduct.

Until the mod responds to the flag they shouldn't be rolling back to their versions until their mouses blast. :-)